Drug legalization.

Any close examination of the contend on do medicatess fiction leads ineluctably to the conclusion that angiotensin converting enzyme weapon could pass on us to the door of victory--legalization. But most who discuss this pic power consider it surrender. How surrender we confused surrender with victory? Lets excoriation by feeling at the struggle on drugs metaphor closely, and define some(prenominal) war terms. First, who or what is the competitor? Second, what defines victory in this war? Is the enemy in this war the drug thieve? No reasonable person believes that. Addicts are in m each slip carriage the victims of a war policy that drives up the price of their starve substances to the point where criminal action at law is their alone alternative to mothy turkey. Alcoholism is often exposit as a sickness. medicine addicts merit the same thoughtfulness alcohol addicts receive. Is the enemy in this war the drug dealers and cartels? If we wear this premise, th e argument becomes in addition free! If they are the only enemy, thence legalization wipes them out with one blow! The huge kale from the inflated black merchandise prices would be gone. That money is their only source of power. Without the vast wealth accumulated from the black market, their presently-powerful organizations would crumble, degenerating into the gross thugs they reliablely are. But the drug dealer is non the real enemy; that would be too simple. When President Nixon origin eithery initiated the war on drugs rhetoric, he referred to drug abuse as the problem. So the most effective way to analyze this metaphor is to discern drug abuse as the enemy we are fighting. straight off that we have identified the enemy, what would constitute victory over that enemy? Would victory be the total eradication of drugs from our society? If drugs and not drug abuse were the enemy, maybe this would...

The dissolving agent to the drug problem is a simple one to a crystal clear mind. MONARCHY, why Monarchy you ask? Its rather simple actually, any criterion of any drug equals a swift and tearing execution. This is what the king of Malaysia guarenteed anyone caught with illegal narcotics. Hence, now the drug problem in Malaysia is well-nigh non-existant. Could a Federal Republic like the organisation of the coupled States impliment such a law? Not in this century, too many people would cry, Unconstitutional, or Too prankish a punishment. Legalization is not the key to the problem. You think its no-account now imagine millions of people running around hopped-up a ll the time, yeah what a soceity that would be. If you want to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay